More strife in Iraq. U.S. financial system in crisis. Rice prices soar.

None of these headlines will matter a bit, though, if two men pursuing a lawsuit in a court in Hawaii turn out to be right. They think a giant particle accelerator that will begin smashing protons together outside Geneva this summer might produce a black hole that will spell the end of the Earth – and maybe the universe. Scientists say that is very unlikely – though they have done some checking just to make sure.

The world’s physicists have spent 14 years and $8 billion building the Large Hadron Collider, in which the colliding protons will recreate energies and conditions last seen a trillionth of a second after the Big Bang. Researchers will sift the debris from these primordial recreations for clues to the nature of mass and new forces and symmetries of nature.

But Walter Wagner and Luis Sancho contend that scientists at the European Center for Nuclear Research, or CERN, have played down the chances that the collider could produce, among other horrors, a tiny black hole, which, they say, could eat the Earth. Or it could spit out something called a “strangelet” that would convert our planet to a shrunken dense dead lump of something called “strange matter.” Their suit also says CERN has failed to provide an environmental impact statement as required under the U.S. National Environmental Policy Act.

Continue Reading…..

The First Fifteen Minutes of September 11th Former Air Traffic Controller Robin Hordon speaks out on 9/11, NORAD and what should have happened on 9/11.

Within three hours of the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, Robin Hordon knew it was an inside job. He had been an Air Traffic Controller (ATC) for eleven years before Reagan fired him and hundreds of his colleagues after they went on strike in the eighties. Having handled in-flight emergencies and two actual hijackings in his career, he is well qualified to comment on what NORAD should have been able to achieve in its response to the near simultaneous hijacking of four domestic passenger carriers on the morning of September 11th, 2001.

Continue reading…….

Het is natuurlijk al duizenden jaren bekend dat je mensen die gemarteld worden alles kunt laten verklaren wat je wil. Zo wist de inquisitie tien, zoniet honderdduizenden, mensen zo gek te krijgen dat ze verklaarden heks of erger, jood, te zijn. Wie helse pijnen ondergaat verklaart wat gevraagd wordt.

“Zeg op: heb jij die aanvallen op New York gepland” “Blubblubblubblub” “WAT!!” “Blubblubberdeblub” “WAT??!!” “Blubblub … YES YES YES!” Betrouwbaar is anders zou je zeggen. Niet voor het starten van een oorlog, want dit soort verklaringen vormen de basis en ruggegraat van het 911 Commission Report.

De betrouwbaarheid van het 911 Commission report, een rapport waarover men beter zwijgen kan, laat staan commentaar op kan geven, is hiermee defintief afgeschreven. Geen enkele conclusie uit dat rapport blijft staan. Het is gebouwd op drijfzand, met een scala aan dubieuze, niet verifieerbare verklaringen, aan de basis.

Lees verder op onderzoek 911…

Even before the bombs fell on Baghdad, a group of senior Pentagon officials were plotting to invade another country.

Their covert campaign once again relied on false intelligence and shady allies. But this time, the target was Iran.

BY JAMES BAMFORD
How did the Bush administration sell the Iraq war? Check out the award-winning story on the PR machine for regime change in Iraq — and join a reader debate: Is war with Iran unavoidable?

Continue Reading……

Steeds weer verschijnen berichten over ‘ ufo Drones’ op het internet. Hierbij wil ik laten zien hoe eenvoudig het is, middels de juiste CGI software, dit soort filmpjes te maken.

En dan de slagroom op het toetje:

Forty years after Democratic rising star Robert F. Kennedy was killed at a Los Angeles hotel during his presidential run, new evidence suggests the man serving a life sentence for his murder did not fire the shots that killed the charismatic senator.

Forensic scientists met at a conference in Connecticut this week to discuss their independent findings that cast serious doubt on the Kennedy assassination. Sirhan Sirhan is serving a life sentence in Kennedy’s death, but the conference presenters argue he could not have fired the fatal shot that killed Kennedy.

One investigator, Dr. Robert Joling, has studied the Kennedy assassination for nearly four decades. He determined the fatal shot came from behind Kennedy, while Sirhan was four to six feet in front of the senator and never got close enough to shoot him from behind, an NBC affiliate reports.

Analysis by another forensics engineer, Philip Van Praag, of a Canadian journalists tape recording, known as the Pruszynski recording, determined that 13 shots were fired while Kennedy was killed, although Sirhan’s gun only held eight bullets, according to the NBC reporter. This suggests that a second shooter was involved in the assassination.

Van Praag’s analysis led him to conclude that a second gun that was fired matched a type owned by one of the security guards in Kennedy’s entourage.

“When that security guard was asked about owning that gun at first he admitted, ‘Yes I owned that kind of gun but I got rid of it two months before the assassination.’” correspondent Amy Parmenter said on MSNBC Wednesday. “It turns out upon further investigation, in fact, he did not get rid of that gun until five months after the shooting. Of course, you can see where we’re going with this. … That security guard, was in fact behind Senator Kennedy when the fatal shot was fired.”

This video is from MSNBC News Live, broadcast March 26, 2008.

Bron/Source: The Raw Story